mrjones2004x
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 387
- Reaction score
- 700
So I’m taking my mk3 900 from 1991 to Marshall tomorrow to have some of the pots changed and a general check over of valves and cap etc but he asked if I wanted to put the amp back to stock. I mention it was modded.
it has a bunch of mods and I do think it sounds amazing but I wonder how it would sound back stock?
I play it with preamp volume on 8 and sensitivity on 20. It’s pure thick and ballsy. If I roll back the sensitivity it’s thin and anemic. Like terrible but I do t use it like this. Wonder how it would be stock ???
mods I can see is
D1, D2, ZD1, ZD2, disconnected.
A capacitor on one of the valve bases has been snipped? Says 22 on it. Assume it’s v1. Not sure which is which. Only one preamp valve has a cap.
R6 on power board has had a extra resister put in parallel. Both resisters are 4.7k? (Yellow, violet, red, gold)I read this is for the negative feedback So 2.35k ohm overall.
Can’t spot any more
Anyone think I should go back to stock? And suggestions.
thanks
it has a bunch of mods and I do think it sounds amazing but I wonder how it would sound back stock?
I play it with preamp volume on 8 and sensitivity on 20. It’s pure thick and ballsy. If I roll back the sensitivity it’s thin and anemic. Like terrible but I do t use it like this. Wonder how it would be stock ???
mods I can see is
D1, D2, ZD1, ZD2, disconnected.
A capacitor on one of the valve bases has been snipped? Says 22 on it. Assume it’s v1. Not sure which is which. Only one preamp valve has a cap.
R6 on power board has had a extra resister put in parallel. Both resisters are 4.7k? (Yellow, violet, red, gold)I read this is for the negative feedback So 2.35k ohm overall.
Can’t spot any more
Anyone think I should go back to stock? And suggestions.
thanks
Last edited: