Dave Friedman's 68 super bass : The secret Van Halen specs ?

pat_rocks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
251
Reaction score
304
Hello,

i just began to watch some tone talk épisodes and in this one :



Dave Friedman puts his number one amp as his own 68 plexi which then John Suhr tells

"the one i modded with the van halen cap ?"

So it turns out that friedman replies ah in this one it's me that have done it. You've done it on other of my amps.

Then i remember that John Fryette posted a video about rebiasing friedman's 68 plexi. This video confirms that this one was the amp and guess what ? Here is what Fryette tells us about how dave friedman plays this amp :

"HE USES A VARIAC WHEN HE IS GOOFING AROUND WITH IT"



Here is how it supposedely sounds with the variac on :




so it is a 50w 68 super bass modded into a super lead and played with a variac isn't there something fishy ? plus he says thats the only amp he would never sell.

We know for sure that John Suhr, Dave Friedman and soldano got to see the real van halen head and they all said it is STOCK what does it mean ? that the red dye applied to solder was mostly intact. but that DOESN'T MEAN that it follows the classical 1959 schematic.

During late 1967 and 68 Marshall was in a transition period and they had tons of supply shortage. Add to this that they were experimenting. So what's the big deal ? Many times you'll find extermely out of place and random components in those era marshalls and defining a stock variant is almost impossible cause most 67-68 heads will sound different.

So if dave plays his amp with a variac and it is a 68 plexi i mean this all seems to point out that he is a van halen fan and he like this exclusive tone. This could mean that he would probably reconfigure his super bass to a 68 super lead based on the van halen plexi. Fryette tells us that this amp has been totally reconfigured in the video.

here is a quote of him :

“I mean, I make amps that have a lot of gain too, but that’s not necessarily where my head’s at. I do it for the people that want more. I mean, to me, the quintessential amp is an old Plexi Super Lead circuit with a Variac, on 10. That’s where my head is, which is quite gainy if it’s set up right, but old-school gainy. You know, more the Van Halen school of Plexi, shall we say."

So here are the weird specs of this amp which friedman rebuilt.

- First of all there is a huge argument coming in favor of the fact that this is indeed an amp which has been to try to replicate values from another amp.

- There are 5 bands resistors on this amp for example there are extremely weird values like a 10.4k resistor where a 100k should be. Putting a 10.4k resistor instead of a 4 band 10k resistor tells us that the one putting this 10.4k resistor is looking at extremely precise values. Usually 4 band resistors have enough accuracy to build an amp it is rare to find 5 band resistors on a plexi because usually you don't need killer accuracy for the components.

here are the exceptionnal weird values :

friedman 68.png
Dont take this board for référence i only put the Big changes compared to a regular 68sl
i forgot to change the 56k tone stack res to a 33k
The 0.022 from the 10.4 is a 0.0022

in the video you can clearly see a

- Correction : 5 band 10.4k ohm following the 820ohm 500pf instead of 100k
- a 5 band 10.4k res instead of 100k going to the Bright channel

weird values.jpg
off the charts.jpg

Correction this seems to be a 10.4k resistor too.

The first electrolytic cap on v1 is 320-330uf but the second is unknown but i think it is a 250uf.

You can even see a capacitor along the dual 32uf which seems to be a mica cap 291b instead of a regular 10k 2watt resistor...

this thing has some crazy off the charts values and components.

Dave friedman gave us those specs for the VH amp components :

Post by RACKSYSTEMS » Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:40 pm

Split cathode V1a 250uF/820,V1b .68/820
All coupling caps are 0.022uF,Bright channel coupling cap is 0.0022uF

470k mixer resistors
500pf [red out of 69 amp] mixer bypass cap
Bypass cap on V2a is .68uF and a 220uf to 470uf
33k/560pF lemco tone stack combo
100k NFB resistor at 4 ohm tap
220k bias splitter resistors
0.1 uF cap on presence control
.022uf output couplers

filtering is
2] 100uf's f&t in series mains
2] 32uf's f&t in series screens
1]100uf lcr phase inverter
1] dual 33 x 33 f&t preamp

which don't seem to be the same as in his own personnal 68 preamp section.

I'm not saying That Dave and suhr lied to us but there may be many possibilities :

- Dave modded this particular 50w amp to sound like a 100w van halen plexi. He and suhr gave us the real complete values.

- Dave copied his preamp section from the VH original Head

in this case perhaps every people to have seen Van halen amp actually signed a paper prohibiting them to tell us what's inside this amp and to copycat the exact same values for amp building and selling. However perhaps that suhr came close to the same sound with his own sl68 preamps specs and that's what Dave Gave us. (The specs dave gave us were almost the same as the suhr sl68). Because it was close enough they gave us those specs for us to stop asking them.

- Dave gave his own shot at how to make a 50w hot rod plexi taking from van halen values mixing with his own.

- They told the truth but didn’t leak every comp value off the charts.

I Guess we will never know but those 68 weird values seem be worth to be tested.

What's your thoughts about this ?

we see almost everything in the video we just lack some components values to have the main components : the cap behind the 2.7k resistor and the resistor or cap along the double 32uf.
 
Last edited:

pat_rocks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
251
Reaction score
304
Update : found out that the electrolytic bypassing the 2,7k is a standard 0.68uf
 

pat_rocks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
251
Reaction score
304
You are misreading those resistors. They are both 100k (brown black yellow are the value bands, the others are the tolerance) ie stock values.

Try it with this color code calculator those are not 100k res. Go try with the 5 band res color code.

In the video you can clearly see it has 5 bands colors. Just Watch it.

right values.png


Here is a color code for 100k with 5 bands :
E1B94595-9183-45B2-A47E-2E2EB132D4D9.jpeg
 
Last edited:

pittbull

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
1,689
Reaction score
676
Stevie Fryette,Mike Soldano,Dave Friedman,John Suhr supposedly seen THE amp in the 90s Jose Arrendondo was Edwards main amp guy from the beginning(70s)until Jose death. Edwards main plexi was sent to some amp nut in holland in 1989-90 who rewired the entire amp(to stock)also replated the chassis( f”@&$?!g nuts)the master volume pot was then removed from the back of the amp,the hole in back was the replaced with a screw to cover up the hole then the four on top amp guys(listed above) seen the amp Edward had many plexi.Stevie Fryette actually changed the transformer on THE amp with a pittbull transformer Matt bruck Edwards main tech in the 90s and business partner(til this day with Wolfgang Van Halen and EVH gear)took the amp to Steven Fryette to have the transformer changed.(John Suhr removed the pittbull transformer and replaced it with a plexi transformer when Suhr seen the amp)Matt Bruck worked for Andy Brauer studio rentals before he worked for Edward Matt had access to many Marshall plexis Matt would deliver gear(many trips to the 5150 studio Ed gave Matt a full time job with him.
 
Last edited:

matttornado

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
1,370
We know for sure that John Suhr, Dave Friedman and soldano got to see the real van halen head and they all said it is STOCK what does it mean ?
They saw that amp after it was returned to stock when Ed sent his amp to be reworked in the 90s. They're late to the game and missed any mods or specs that Ed's amp had up to that point. Ed said it never sounded the same since then. So the magic was taken away by the guy in Holland. Maybe the amp had the Jose master with the clipping diodes and that was part of it? Who knows. LOL
 
Last edited:

neikeel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
7,943
Reaction score
8,417

Try it with this color code calculator those are not 100k res. Go try with the 5 band res color code.

In the video you can clearly see it has 5 bands colors. Just Watch it.

View attachment 126939

Based on the lower of those. Two pics I see a 100k brown black yellow followed by red band and gold band. I don’t think that is controversial.
The other values in a plexi on the plate and cathode follower would just be weird.
 

FleshOnGear

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,403
Reaction score
2,513
Location
Virginia
They saw that amp after it was returned to stock when Ed sent his amp to be reworked in the 90s. They're late to the game and missed any mods or specs that Ed's amp had up to that point. Ed said it never sounded the same since then. So the magic was taken away by the guy in Holland. Maybe the amp had the Jose master with the clipping diodes and that was part of it? Who knows. LOL
Is there a particular reason nobody can contact the guy from Holland who put the amp back to stock? Couldn’t that guy say what was modded? Is it not known who he is/was?
 

pat_rocks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
251
Reaction score
304
Based on the lower of those. Two pics I see a 100k brown black yellow followed by red band and gold band. I don’t think that is controversial.
The other values in a plexi on the plate and cathode follower would just be weird.
perhaps it would be the reason it sounds so different compared to other plexis. There is a video explaining that playing with higher load plate resistors makes the amp more compressed and easier to play :



for the tone slope 100k to 10k i can't find how it would affect the tone.
 

pat_rocks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
251
Reaction score
304
I think you and I will just have to disagree on this. I’ll tootle along in my own sweet way being wrong and I’ll still be happy. 😉
i don't know i posted this on many forums many people are disagreeing some say it is clearly a 5 band resistor and can't be a 100k others say that's probably an old resistor and color bands didn't work the same as today back in the days xd... But trainwrecks use 10k for cathode follower 39k for soldano. SO who knows ?

the only way to really find out would be to measure it.

this amp doesn't sound like a regular marshall if you listen to the last 15sec of the video so really out of place values could make sense.

a resistor specialist would be nice xd
 
Last edited:

playloud

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
1,684
Reaction score
2,617
I think you're overlooking two important details here:

1. EVH's Super Lead was apparently only 50W.
2. And it used a PT from the 80s. Is time travel part of the brown sound?!
 

WiderGates

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2021
Messages
55
Reaction score
59
Location
Upper Palatinate, Bavaria, Germany
... But trainwrecks use 10k for cathode follower 39k for soldano. SO who knows ?
Hello,
Trainwrecks have no cathode follower.
What you mean is called cold clipper where the 10k or 39k lives in the Trainwrecks and Soldanos.
A cold clipper is a "cold" biased gain stage and not a cathode follower.

Almost all Marshalls have a DC cathode follower before the tonestack and when then with a 100k.
Some Marshalls like the 2003 or JCM800 have a cold clipper with 10k (and a cathode follower with 100k).
There are some Marshalls with a tube driven FX with a separate AC cathode follower with a 10k.

Edit: Sorry, the last 10k at the AC cathode follower should also read 100k.
 
Last edited:

66 Kicks

Active Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2019
Messages
102
Reaction score
92
I’m not an electronics expert, but I don’t think a 12AX7/ECC83 is able to source enough current to drive a 10k load.
A 12AX7 in the gain stage/cathode follower setup in this amp can do the 7mA to 8mA of cathode current necessary at idle. But, it will require a positive grid-to-cathode voltage which means there will be grid current. A LOT of grid current, like maybe over 1mA.
 

66 Kicks

Active Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2019
Messages
102
Reaction score
92
A 10.4k plate resistor would cut the gain down to around 15, maybe even less. Does the amp sound like it has a low gain pre-amp? If not, it doesn't have a 10.4k plate resistor.

A 10.4k cathode resistor on the cathode follower would pretty much shear off all of the positive side of the signal. Does the amp sound crappy at almost any volume? If not, it doesn't have a 10.4k cathode resistor.
 

pittbull

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
1,689
Reaction score
676
Just found out something very interesting Kurt James who was around the Van Halen early club days that the so called JBL speakers Edward used where not JBL speakers but Radio Shack speakers with silver clones that look liked JBL speakers. Kurt James was recently on you tube Van Halen stories # 22 and talks about that
 
Top