![]() |
|
|
|
|
__________________
This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Marshall Amp Forum |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Depends on if the output transformer you currently have is the weak link in your tone chain or not. Without knowing what type of amp, gear combination or type of tone you're after we can't really answer this question accurately. What kind of amp are we talking about?
__________________
Jon Wilder Wilder Amplification - The official home of the 80s cock of the walk "Schwank" ![]() http://www.wilderamps.com http://www.facebook.com/wilderamps |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 50
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
lets say for a stock DSL? Just wondering how much difference I will hear in the tone. I used to own one and got some great results with NOS tubes in there. But will the OT, PT, choke etc have much of a bearing? If so how much of a bearing will it have at lower volumes compared to when its cranked?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Lots of positive reports on upgrading DSL/TSL trannys to the MM trannies. The stock trannys in these amps are in fact A weak link (not the only weak link but one of them). MM is one of the only manufacturers of DSL/TSL upgrade trannies. The other one is JCMJMP here on the boards.
Buggs.Crosby here on the forum upgraded to MM trannies in his and I believe TwinACStacks upgraded with JCMJMP's upgrade trannies and both had positive results with their tone. So you have a couple of options here.
__________________
Jon Wilder Wilder Amplification - The official home of the 80s cock of the walk "Schwank" ![]() http://www.wilderamps.com http://www.facebook.com/wilderamps |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Somewhere with a Friedman Marshall & Les Paul.
Posts: 2,719
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
I put a MM OT in a chinese amp, it tightened up the low end a bit......$300 bucks for that, after tubes and the price i paid for the amp i could have had a nice JMP.
MM are overpriced IMHO, Heyboer & Onetics are just as good and probably cheaper. I got caught in the marketing on MM's webpage.
__________________
Marshall, Gibson, Fender, Charvel/Jackson. After the Firebird X, i'm quite convinced Henry Juszkiewicz is crazy. ![]() I endorse Laura & Valve Queen tubes and so should you. ![]() ![]() Member of the JMP Hall of Fame. ![]() Dave Friedman of RACKSYSTEMS is a genius. Friedman KS JMP:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS3PDNZOKMw |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
Also, I good luck with transformers made by MAGNETIC COMPONENTS on my JCM 800 combo. They work great and very modestly priced. Last edited by Crossrhoads2005; 09-26-2010 at 09:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 748
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
I am intrested in swapping my OT on my SL-X. Would a Heyboyer/MojoTone OT improve my tone, or would it be like stock replacement??
I think the MM Transformers are EXPENSIVE!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tulsa / Northern Texas.
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
Saying Mercury Magnetics transformers are expensive is one thing, saying they are dull and lifeless is irresponsible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: I've got a Friggin' MIDI..... In DETROIT
Posts: 15,576
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
No, but what I HAVE found is that Mercuries tend to sound more "MODERN" IE: Upfront and in Your face, so to speak. They are wonderful in 900s and JCM2000s and I'd bet they kick ass in JVMs--But I wouldn't recommend, (JMHO), their OTs in earlier Marshalls like Plexis or JTMs. You will lose some of that "Vintagey Goodness".The reason the Older Amps sound looser and smoother is the Shitty components they used way back when. Over the Years the drift of these components gives them that Vintage tone. Don't ask me why inferior caps like old mustards bring ridiculous prices, but they do. ![]() TWIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 748
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tulsa / Northern Texas.
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Yeah, you mean the shootout on Classic Tone's website.
![]() Unfortunately it is difficult to develop an opinion outside that sphere of influence unless you have access. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: S.Jersey
Posts: 6,363
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Those that are saying Mercury Magnetics are overpriced must not have a clue and i will tell you why......this is before getting to know Jon
i was planning on changing my lame DSL tranny with a MM.....then by chance a Fat Stack and a choke popped up on fleabay.....before i decided to bid i contacted MM to see if there was anyway i could test it before i installed it to make sure all was good. i dont remember who it was that responded to me (though i stiil have that email i think) in that email i was told this dont worry if it is indeed a MM fat stack it will be fine...if not send it in and we will take care of it first thing that came into my head was "****ing Insane"....this is a used item and they are giving me some kinda warranty?.......not sure if that was the case but DSHell would not sound the same without them and it is the very same one that i bid on and won how many other companies can or will do that?....again they were used! Over priced?......at $220 used for both to my door and backed up by the manufacturer is far from over priced........that is a customer for life! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 16,631
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
I hadn't read the whole thing at this point but, i actualy liked the Heyboer,weber THEN classic and LASTLY the MM going purely from sound clips. the heyboer had a more agressive quality with more upper mid emphasis. I liked that about it it was very marshall" sounding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 491
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
where's this tranny shootout located? I'd like to take a listen
__________________
DSL100 + Soldano 2x12 w/ Vintage 30's+ 1960A cab Martimus Maximus NOS Tone Pack Schecter C-1 FR w/dimarzios 09 Les Paul Studio 67 Fender Mustang |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: S.Jersey
Posts: 6,363
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
i agree with Hollowbody on this.....for one i did not find a shootout on that link....for two....it is manufacturers page....why should we beleive anything other than a bias against their competition?
now i am not saying anything bad about them as i have no experience with them but at least have a shootout that is impartial if there was one |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tulsa / Northern Texas.
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
I have used a MM Toneclone 045JT and then switched to a MM Radiospare 045RS2 in the same amp both times with different sounding results. I don't think all MM opt have the same sonic signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tulsa / Northern Texas.
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
FWIW:
I like MM but I know they are expensive when I payed straight out retail. I just like being able to hear a compairson from users not companies. I have a Heyboer opt on a Watts audio Supro clone, my Valve Jr. has a Weber opt. And I plan on using Magnetic Components on my 18 watt kit and hopefully a Ceriatone Crem Brulee kit. Seriously, if I can get excellent tone from Classic Tone then why not save the cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
tonality is great in low volume playing (1x12") with only volume 1 ![]() ![]() ![]() or in studio using 1960 4x12" with volume 7 or more... and what makes me happy that the 2204 clone cut through the mix in the band.. other guitarist was using 5150, and couldn't hear his guitar clearly, but he sure did hear my guitar loud n clear ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() and the price for the iron is just right for my budget, even though in my case shipping and taxes are pain in the ass... ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ft.WorthTX
Posts: 557
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
__________________
Voodoo JCM 800 2210 Guiterrez modded JCM900 SLX JCM 2000 DSL 50 Chupacabra 50 VS 8100 Randall Century 200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tulsa / Northern Texas.
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
Are you using Sozo caps? It looks like it, those are great caps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: S.Jersey
Posts: 6,363
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
but i am basing my MM opinion after having owned them for around a year or so. and i had great results so i am a little biased towards them.....one tranny not mentioned was the Lydian and i would try his also as we have heard of positive results here on the boards and as far as modern sounding i would have to agree....but i also have the Fat Stack which was intended to sound modern.......here is a pic of them side by side....there is a good amount of iron to it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,116
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
A good upgrade tranny like the ones I have on www.lydian.ca will really open up your amp. I found that my DSL has more definition, balls and it just seems alive with the new OT. I love it and so do others:
Lydian OT and choke |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 748
|
Re: Mercury Magnetics?
Quote:
It was not done by them, it was done by Granger Amplification
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|