![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 62
|
Series vs Parallel FX Loops for amp slave
What is the best way to slave DSL 50 FX send to another amp, considering that the DSL 50 has a Series loop and has to return. I know that with a parallel loop you do not have to return to slave... Is there a rack mount active splitter that could accomplish this ? Could you send into a strereo reverb and return left then slave right ?
__________________
DSL-50 DSL-50 1960AC 1960BV 1960A 1984 Jackson RR Custom 2006 Les Paul Classic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: philly pa
Posts: 36
|
Re: Series vs Parallel FX Loops for amp slave
eff loop out to any eff w/ left right outs. left to return of 1st dsl, right to return to 2nd dsl. 2nd dsl is now your slave(presence knob still works, rest of eq is out of circut). go phills
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Series vs Parallel FX Loops for amp slave
And if you don't have a stereo effect as your last effect, you can use an ABY box to split one signal to both amps at the end of the pedal chain.
__________________
Jon Wilder Wilder Amplification sales@wilderamplification.com tech@wilderamplification.com Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 62
|
Re: Series vs Parallel FX Loops for amp slave
Quote:
That was easy with the parallel loop. I had to lift ground on the MG to kill the ground buzz, which was very stupid. Lucky I didn't fry myself...
__________________
DSL-50 DSL-50 1960AC 1960BV 1960A 1984 Jackson RR Custom 2006 Les Paul Classic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||
|
Senior Member
|
Re: Series vs Parallel FX Loops for amp slave
Quote:
__________________
Jon Wilder Wilder Amplification sales@wilderamplification.com tech@wilderamplification.com Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Our Network: Les Paul Forum | Music Gear Forum | 7 String Guitar Forum