Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input

BlackMetal · 06-27-2011, 06:02 PM

Hi

I currently own a JVM410H, and a Digitech Effects processor RP350

I was running this pedal through the amps main input

(Guitar --->Effects Pedal ---> AMP input (front)

I was running this on the clean channel with all Bass - Mid - Treble all Midway.

Is there anything wrong with running the Effects pedal through the front input of the amp, instead of the FX loop. And could this cause any harm to the valves or amp (Running heavy distortion from the pedal, through a channel that's usually clean).

Also do many other people do it this way with valve amps.

Thank you

nedcronin · 06-27-2011, 06:28 PM

Nothing wrong with that, if you are using OD or Distortion effects that is the way to go. Some folks might use time/ delay type effects through the loop depending on taste and your tolerance for noise. Also unless you run your amp super clean, the delays will just get muddy going through the amps pre amp stages.

sccloser · 06-27-2011, 11:15 PM

I agree. Merely a matter of preference. Will not damage the amp running straight into the input.

DSL100 Dude · 06-27-2011, 11:18 PM

Not exactly the best way to get the most from your Marshall but you can run it like that.

Jesstaa · 06-28-2011, 09:13 AM

Why do you buy Marshalls highest gain/most versatile all tube amp just to negate it by using a digital effects processor?
Not trying to sound like a dick, just asking an honest question.

Stringjunkie · 06-28-2011, 09:51 AM

My friggin dream amp, you dont need no stinkin digifects pedals.

V-man · 06-28-2011, 10:06 AM

If I had your rig, I would set it up in one of two ways:

Before the amp (like the OP asked): modulation only: Chorus, phase, flange, etc. to taste (no delay or reverb).

or

In the loop" Modulation only: Chorus, phase, flange, etc. to taste (including delay and reverb).

What I would not do is use the "dirt" on the rack. Granted, I would be tempted to mess with it a bit, but it's not like you have a 4100 on your hands. The amp you have is very high gain AND very versatile, thus more dirt options (lesser ones at that) are more distractions that get in the way of playing (and perhaps tone as well).

06-27-2011, 06:02 PM	#1 (permalink)
BlackMetal Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 4	Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input Hi I currently own a JVM410H, and a Digitech Effects processor RP350 I was running this pedal through the amps main input (Guitar --->Effects Pedal ---> AMP input (front) I was running this on the clean channel with all Bass - Mid - Treble all Midway. Is there anything wrong with running the Effects pedal through the front input of the amp, instead of the FX loop. And could this cause any harm to the valves or amp (Running heavy distortion from the pedal, through a channel that's usually clean). Also do many other people do it this way with valve amps. Thank you

06-27-2011, 06:28 PM	#2 (permalink)
nedcronin Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Rhode Island Posts: 1,445	Re: Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input Nothing wrong with that, if you are using OD or Distortion effects that is the way to go. Some folks might use time/ delay type effects through the loop depending on taste and your tolerance for noise. Also unless you run your amp super clean, the delays will just get muddy going through the amps pre amp stages. diesect20022000 likes this. __________________ Check out my Marshall Amp Lovers facebook page if you facebook....click below Click Here if you love Marshalls! Come Join the TSL Tribe!

06-27-2011, 11:15 PM	#3 (permalink)
sccloser Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: South Carolina Posts: 2,075	Re: Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input I agree. Merely a matter of preference. Will not damage the amp running straight into the input. __________________ 1986 Marshall JCM 800 2205 1991 Marshall JCM 900 Mkiii 2500 2003 Marshall JCM 2000 DSL 401 2010 Marshall Class 5 Combo JCM 800 Lead Series 1960b cab JCM 900 Lead Series 1960a cab 1960 ax cab (greenbacks)

06-28-2011, 09:13 AM	#5 (permalink)
Jesstaa Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Victoria, Australia Posts: 2,697	Re: Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input Why do you buy Marshalls highest gain/most versatile all tube amp just to negate it by using a digital effects processor? Not trying to sound like a dick, just asking an honest question. Stringjunkie likes this. __________________ GEAR LIST Amps 1983 JCM 800 2203 1960AX Guitars B.C Rich Bich Perfect 10 Jackson Kelly Basses Ibanez SR300 Stagg BC300 I'm not a tech, don't take my advice as fact, I just like to offer my views.

06-28-2011, 09:51 AM	#6 (permalink)
Stringjunkie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: S W Florida Posts: 3,311	Re: Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input My friggin dream amp, you dont need no stinkin digifects pedals.

Today
Marshall Amps	Sponsored Links __________________ This advertising will not be shown in this way to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Marshall Amp Forum

06-28-2011, 10:06 AM	#7 (permalink)
V-man Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 3,821	Re: Effects Pedal Through Tube Amp Input If I had your rig, I would set it up in one of two ways: Before the amp (like the OP asked): modulation only: Chorus, phase, flange, etc. to taste (no delay or reverb). or In the loop" Modulation only: Chorus, phase, flange, etc. to taste (including delay and reverb). What I would not do is use the "dirt" on the rack. Granted, I would be tempted to mess with it a bit, but it's not like you have a 4100 on your hands. The amp you have is very high gain AND very versatile, thus more dirt options (lesser ones at that) are more distractions that get in the way of playing (and perhaps tone as well). __________________ If you are wondering why I am no longer posting/on-site: http://www.marshallforum.com/backsta...ds-grunch.html

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode